👥Social proof: Evaluation is done by selected fellow members of the same community, because we believe they are the most qualified to evaluate how important a given claim is to their community. Anonymity of validators & auditors: Validators and auditors evaluating a claim maybe unknown to the applicant or any other participants in the process. In this way we can avoid collusion between participants. 🤫 Random selection of validators & auditors: By randomly selecting validators and auditors, neither applicants, admins or other validators know who will be assigned to a given claim, avoiding collusion between participants. ✨ Secret voting: Votes are secret, so validators and auditors are protected from any type of pressure or influence from other participants, either before or after voting. This is also an option that can be decided by the community admin.🎭 Self-auditing: Every certain number of claims we randomly assign one (or more) additional auditors to cross-check the validators vote. This is used to collect stats on validators behavior, and automatically detect and warn on “bad actors” over time.🤝 Community rules: Communities can set their own claim types, credential prices, and validation rules (the master plan) for each claim type. We can say they “own” the protocol for their own use cases.✅ No-code platform: allowing community admins to easily create/edit the submission forms, admin community member roles (enabling and disabling electors), set the voting strategies, define fee payments and distribution, etc.👨💻